Two-year outcome after angiographically documented myocardial reperfusion for acute coronary occlusion. Thrombolysis and Angioplasty Study Group.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Reperfusion therapy has been clearly shown to decrease the early mortality after acute myocardial infarction, but the impact of this therapy on long-term survival has been less extensively evaluated. This study reports the extended follow-up of a large cohort of 810 patients treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy combined, when considered necessary to maintain or augment infarct vessel patency, with mechanical reperfusion therapies. Each patient underwent coronary angiography within 2 hours of the initiation of the thrombolytic infusion. Coronary angioplasty was performed in 62% of the patients before hospital discharge and 21% underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Follow-up was obtained in 96% to a mean of 18.8 months (range, 1.5 to 48 months). All-cause mortality over this period was 3.3%; 2.1% died from cardiac causes. Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 5.1%. Although the low event rate limits the validity of statistical comparisons, the patients who survived the follow-up period tended to be younger (56 +/- 10 vs 65 +/- 7 years), to have better predischarge left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction, 52 +/- 11 vs 46 +/- 13%) and to have a lower prevalence of multivessel coronary artery disease (45 vs 67%). This excellent long-term survival may, in part, reflect the exclusion of high-risk patients from enrollment in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) studies. It may also be attributable, however, to the frequent use of combined thrombolysis and mechanical revascularization in this population.
منابع مشابه
Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by primary coronary angioplasty or intravenous thrombolysis in the "real world": one-year results from a nationwide French survey.
BACKGROUND Recent randomized trials comparing primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolysis at the acute stage of myocardial infarction have shown a limited but definite advantage for primary angioplasty. The aim of this study was to document 1-year outcome in patients receiving either thrombolysis or primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in the "real world." METHODS...
متن کاملA randomized trial of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty as a rescue intervention after failed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to assess whether coronary stenting produces better results compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after failed thrombolysis. BACKGROUND Little evidence exists on the value of rescue mechanical reperfusion after failed thrombolysis. METHODS This open-label, randomized study enrolled 181 patients with AMI refer...
متن کاملFailure of thrombolysis: experience with a policy of early angiography and rescue angioplasty for electrocardiographic evidence of failed thrombolysis.
OBJECTIVE To assess the outcome of a policy of emergency coronary angiography with or without rescue angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction and ECG evidence of failed reperfusion after thrombolysis. DESIGN A cohort study. SETTING Regional cardiothoracic unit. PATIENTS 197 patients with acute myocardial infarction fulfilling a simple ECG criterion of failed reperfusion. ...
متن کاملPrimary Coronary Angioplasty versus Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction - a Comparative Study at Queen Alia Heart Institute
Objectives: To assess the results of primary coronary angioplasty in comparison to thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction, and to compare the time from arrival of a patient with acute myocardial infarction at the coronary care unit of Queen Alia Heart Institute to having reperfusion therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective study looking at consecuti...
متن کاملThe Pathology of Myocardial Infarction
Coronary artery thrombosis, due either fissuring or erosion of atherosclerotic plaque, is the usual cause of acute myocardial infarction (1) and results in a progressive increase of the infarct size with a wavefront transmural extension from the endocardium towards the epicardium (2,3). Although thrombolysis and reperfusion can occur spontaneously, thrombotic coronary artery occlusion usually p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The American journal of cardiology
دوره 66 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1990